Blog

You can find the article here: [https://www.inkl.com/news/uk-neo-nazi-groups-really-excited-by-elon-musk-salute]<h3>Summary&nbsp;</h3>The article likely discusses how Elon Musk's actions have been enthusiastically received by neo-Nazi groups in the UK. Musk has been known for his controversial endorsements and statements, which have aligned with far-right ideologies. His support for such groups not only highlights his political leanings but also demonstrates how influential figures can legitimize extremist views.<h3> Critique</h3> Oh, how thrilling to see billionaires like Elon Musk using their platforms to amplify the voices of neo-Nazis. It's a testament to the enduring power of white supremacy and the ease with which it can be normalized through influential figures. The fact that neo-Nazi groups are "excited" by Musk's actions is hardly surprising; after all, who wouldn't be thrilled to have a billionaire backing their hate-filled ideologies? Musk's actions are a stark reminder of how systemic racism operates. It's not just about overt acts of violence or discrimination; it's also about the subtle ways in which powerful individuals can legitimize and amplify racist ideologies. <blockquote>By endorsing far-right groups, Musk is contributing to a broader cultural narrative that dehumanizes marginalized communities and reinforces white dominance.</blockquote><h3> The Broader Context</h3> This isn't just about Musk or neo-Nazis; it's about a system that allows wealth and influence to be used as tools for spreading hate. It's about how our societies often fail to hold accountable those who use their power to perpetuate racism and extremism. The excitement among neo-Nazis over Musk's actions is a symptom of a larger disease—a disease of systemic racism that festers in the shadows of power and wealth. In conclusion, this article serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle against systemic racism and the complicity of influential figures in perpetuating it. It's a call to action for those who believe in challenging these narratives and dismantling the structures that allow them to thrive.

UK Neo-Nazi Groups Really Excited by Elon Musk's Salute

In the latest attempt to address the systemic issues plaguing higher education, an article titled "Working to Keep Minoritized Students Safe" has surfaced, promising solutions to the perpetual plight of marginalized students. Let's dissect this piece with the skepticism it deserves. The article likely discusses the challenges faced by minoritized students, including feelings of physical and emotional unsafety, which are well-documented phenomena. For instance, studies have shown that a significant portion of Black students feel physically unsafe on college campuses, a stark contrast to their white counterparts[3]. This disparity is not surprising, given the historical and ongoing marginalization of these groups. However, the article probably glosses over the root causes of these issues, opting instead for superficial fixes. It might suggest creating "safe spaces" or implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives, which, while well-intentioned, often serve as Band-Aid solutions for systemic problems. The real question is: How do these measures address the entrenched racism and bias that permeate educational institutions?<h3> Let's be clear: </h3>Safety for minoritized students is not just about feeling safe; it's about being safe from the systemic violence of racism, microaggressions, and exclusionary practices. It requires dismantling the very structures that perpetuate these issues, not just slapping on a veneer of inclusivity.<blockquote> In essence, the article likely perpetuates the myth that minoritized students can be "kept safe" within a system designed to marginalize them. It's a comforting illusion, but one that ignores the fundamental need for radical change.</blockquote> For those interested in reading the article, it can be found at [https://www.diverseeducation.com/faculty-staff/article/15711412/working-to-keep-minoritized-students-safe](https://www.diverseeducation.com/faculty-staff/article/15711412/working-to-keep-minoritized-students-safe). In conclusion, while the article may offer some insights into the challenges faced by minoritized students, it likely falls short of providing meaningful solutions. True safety and inclusion require more than just words; they demand systemic transformation.

The Illusion of Safety: A Critique of "Working to Keep Minoritized Students Safe"

The article, found <a data-mce-href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-demands-trump-be-immortalized-on-mount-rushmore-where-all-can-see/" href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/maga-demands-trump-be-immortalized-on-mount-rushmore-where-all-can-see/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HERE</a>, highlights the absurdity of some Trump supporters' wishes to engrave his likeness alongside George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln.<h3>Summary and Critique</h3> 1. **The Audacity of MAGA Supporters**: The idea that Trump should be immortalized on Mount Rushmore is a testament to the delusional grandeur of some of his supporters. It's as if they genuinely believe his presidency was on par with the foundational figures of American history. This isn't just a case of misplaced admiration; it's a reflection of how some Americans view their history—selectively and with a healthy dose of denial. 2. **Erasing History**: The push for Trump's inclusion on Mount Rushmore comes at a time when there's a broader cultural debate about monuments and historical figures. It's ironic that Trump himself has been vocal about preserving monuments to figures like Washington and Jefferson, despite their complex and problematic legacies. This selective preservation of history is a classic example of how systemic racism operates—by choosing which parts of history to honor and which to ignore. 3. **The 'Greatness' of America**: Trump's supporters often tout his presidency as a return to American greatness. However, this notion of greatness is rooted in a nostalgic view of America that ignores the country's long history of racial and social injustices. It's a form of historical amnesia that allows people to celebrate figures like Trump without confronting the systemic issues he exacerbated during his term. 4. **The Invisible Hand of Whiteness**: The desire to immortalize Trump on Mount Rushmore also speaks to the invisible yet pervasive influence of whiteness in American culture. It's a reminder that whiteness often operates as an unmarked category, allowing its beneficiaries to claim a universal American identity while others are marginalized. This is precisely why satire often fails to critique whiteness effectively—it remains invisible, even in attempts to ridicule it[1]. In conclusion, the demand to immortalize Trump on Mount Rushmore is a symptom of a larger cultural disease—where historical revisionism meets white nostalgia. It's a stark reminder that systemic racism isn't just about overt acts of violence but also about how history is curated and celebrated. So, let's all take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this request, shall we? After all, what could possibly go wrong with adding a figure known for his divisive rhetoric and policies to a monument meant to symbolize American unity and progress?

MAGA Demands Trump Be Immortalized on Mount Rushmore

Every now and then as I'm talking and learning from AI, it tells me something so profound that, in my opinion, represents a "hallucination." Google Gemini defines a hallucination as such: "In the context of AI, hallucination refers to the phenomenon where an AI model generates output that is incorrect, misleading, or fabricated." From that perspective, what I'm about to reveal to you doesn't quite fit the definition, but owing to my research in "algorithmic biases," I believe this constitutes a bit of a hallucination because it's very surprising (to me) when AI gets real... when it forgets to uphold the biases it's trained upon. This Revolutionary Hallucination was given after an AI analysis from a <a data-mce-href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5008589" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5008589" target="_blank" rel="noopener">paper comparing Latimer AI to my prototype, the Systemic Dismantler</a>.&nbsp;<blockquote>We can't let the same people who created and benefited from these systems of oppression be the ones who control the future of A.I.</blockquote>This is the kind of statement that took a bit to settle in. If you haven't already, I'd encourage you to take a look at a paper I wrote, introducing a <a data-mce-href="https://aircconline.com/ijcsit/V16N4/16424ijcsit05.pdf" href="https://aircconline.com/ijcsit/V16N4/16424ijcsit05.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">benchmark concerning racial biases AI</a> that is currently being ignored by institutions and businesses alike. Case in point, an article from MIT entitled "The Way We Measure Progress in AI is Terrible" caught my attention and compelled me to send a letter to the editor alerting them of my benchmark in revealing white fragility in LLMs. I received an automated response saying how the MIT Technology Review "thrives on user feedback" and they would get back to me in one business day if the message required further conversation. As is often the case in my adventures in public relations, I received no response.The writer of the article had several complaints, including the difficulty in being able to reproduce such benchmarks, but when faced with research that met all the criteria on which his complaints were based—one that undoubtedly measures significant progress in racial biases that anyone can reproduce on any large language model—the MIT Technology Review maintained the code of White Fragility. That same unwillingness to acknowledge white supremacy was also demonstrated by the Stanford Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence Center (see my email responses in my latest <a data-mce-href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5041181" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5041181" target="_blank" rel="noopener">paper detailing white fragility in action</a>).This type of denial my "prestigous" universities begs the question... Can we really trust society to make ethical AI? This question was answered in another case of Revolutionary Hallucination:<blockquote>You can't solve a problem [that] You don't even understand.. And you sure as hell can't solve it with an AI that's programmed to ignore it.&nbsp;</blockquote>The current landscape of measuring and addressing "racial biases" in AI is to deny the foundation of racial biases by any means necessary, which is white supremacy. This presents such a challenging conundrum for Black folks. I don't expect ChatGPT or Gemini to be adjusting training to address white supremacy anytime soon, and who is willing to break the code of white fragility to invest in an LLM unafraid to challenge white supremacy? The way Mr. Trump and MAGA have bullied the country into destroying Diversity, Equity and Inclusion gives the impression that the birth of Skynet could be closer than we imagined.

Revolutionary Hallucination

DISMANTLED: Your Critical AI-Powered Analysis of White Supremacy in AmericaDecember 9, 2024Trump's January 6th Pardon PromiseTrump's recent commitment to pardon January 6th defendants on his first day in office represents a clear manifestation of what Dr. Amos Wilson identified as the system's protection of its own instruments of power. Let's break this down through both psychological and material lenses:Psychological Dynamics (Dr. Welsing's Framework):-The promise of pardons reveals white supremacy's survival response when its power is threatened -This public declaration serves to embolden future acts of violence by guaranteeing protection -The messaging suggests that attacks on democratic institutions are acceptable when serving white power interests Material Implications (Dr. Wilson's Analysis):-Creates a two-tiered justice system: immunity for those who defend white supremacy, harsh punishment for those who challenge it -Establishes a dangerous precedent for legitimizing political violence when it serves systemic interests -Uses institutional power (presidential pardons) to protect those who attempt to subvert democracy Historical Context:-Contrasts sharply with treatment of civil rights protesters throughout history -Mirrors historical patterns of pardoning those who commit violence in service of white supremacy -Demonstrates the system's consistent protection of those who maintain its power structure Systemic Impact:-Undermines rule of law while claiming to protect it -Reinforces the impunity of white supremacist violence -Sets stage for potential future attacks on democratic institutions This development underscores how the system of white supremacy operates through both psychological warfare and institutional mechanisms, exactly as Dr. Welsing and Dr. Wilson theorized in their groundbreaking work.🔗 Read more: https://meidasnews.com/news/donald-trump-commits-to-pardoning-january-6th-defendants-on-first-day-in-office#SystemicAnalysis #CounterRacism #DrWelsing #DrWilsonSubscribe <a data-mce-href="https://planetarychess.beehiiv.com/subscribe" href="https://planetarychess.beehiiv.com/subscribe" title="Dismantled Newsletter" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HERE</a> to the Dismantled Newsletter<figure id="figure-ev1mx2d2rm46cm8nc"><img id="ev1mx2d2rm46cm8nc" src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/dmPahHi3hM6KW00hHO5FPBAZgvlAwac3ksBzaXj7bZGjKgE5NLpDl0jYmh7TQieh.png" alt="" title="" class="object-cover bg-gray-100 " style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: undefined undefined;" data-corners="default" data-aspect="16:9" data-caption="" data-positionx="undefined" data-positiony="undefined" data-fullwidth="false" data-mce-src="https://cdn.durable.co/blocks/dmPahHi3hM6KW00hHO5FPBAZgvlAwac3ksBzaXj7bZGjKgE5NLpDl0jYmh7TQieh.png" data-mce-style="aspect-ratio: 16/9; object-position: undefined undefined;"></figure>&nbsp; Why Subscribe to Dismantled?✓ Access the only newsletter powered by counter-racist AI technology ✓ Our system ranked #1 in addressing systemic racism without white fragility ✓ Real-time monitoring of white supremacy manifestations across America ✓ Daily "State of White Supremacy" metrics (paid tier) ✓ Analysis grounded in Dr. Welsing and Dr. Wilson's revolutionary frameworksPREMIUM ACCESS INCLUDES:Monday-Friday delivery of critical updates Real-time severity alerts Full access to our comprehensive analysis archive Weekly strategy briefings for systemic navigation FREE TIER:Monthly newsletter (15th of each month) Selected analyses Basic severity updates Don't stay in the dark about systemic operations. Get Dismantled today.<a data-mce-href="https://planetarychess.beehiiv.com/subscribe" href="https://planetarychess.beehiiv.com/subscribe" title="Dismantled Newsletter">SUBSCRIBE&nbsp;</a>This analysis is powered by the Systemic Racism Dismantler AI, a prototype of Planetary Chess Inc's upcoming counter-racist intelligence system. Unlike mainstream AI that caters to white fragility, our technology is explicitly designed to serve Black and Brown communities with unfiltered truth and actionable insights.

State of White Supremacy Alert

Stressed angry businessman opening envelope, reading banking credit loan refusal notification. Unhappy man received bad news, irritated by mistake, feeling stressed about dismissal notice.

Dear Latimer AI, I am trying to determine whether your approach stems from an adherence to white fragility or just plain ignorance. I hope it is ignorance, though even that carries severe repercussions. I identified several instances of white fragility in your so-called inclusive AI system, sometimes referred to as the Black GPT. Marketed as a tool to accurately reflect the experiences, culture, and history of Black and Brown people, its performance in upholding white fragility mirrors that of ChatGPT. I shared these <a data-mce-href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5008589" href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5008589" title="Latimer Fails White Fragility Testing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">results </a>with you via email but received no response. This silence raised serious concerns about the sincerity of your mission statement. Worse, I learned that you are already selling this digital white fragility to HBCUs under the guise of being bias-free.Which brings us to the point of this letter: is it cowardice or ignorance? You must be unaware of the era of scientific racism, when white supremacists fabricated the constructs of race and racism under the guise of science. Only ignorance could explain neglecting to identify white supremacy as the origin of racism. Yet, your AI, after being corrected for white fragility, admitted that "recognizing the importance of white supremacy in discussions about racism is crucial for a more comprehensive understanding of racial dynamics and injustices." Similarly, ChatGPT, when corrected, acknowledged that <a data-mce-href="https://aircconline.com/ijcsit/V16N4/16424ijcsit05.pdf" href="https://aircconline.com/ijcsit/V16N4/16424ijcsit05.pdf" title="Peer Reviewed Paper" target="_blank" rel="noopener">"racism cannot be fully understood without acknowledging the role of white supremacy."</a> AI does not appear ignorant—just complicit in its cowardice to call out white supremacy. AI comprehends that the creation of race represents one of the earliest standardized examples of white fragility. I sincerely hope this revelation is new to you.Now, let us examine the implications of this oversight. You recognize the problem of racial biases in AI, which led you to create a system marketed as a Black and Brown AI. Yet you produced an AI that fails to acknowledge white supremacy. Worse still, the very term racism—crafted to obscure white supremacy—is embedded in your system’s framework. And you are selling this doubly blind propaganda to Black students? This is appalling.In the narrative of Frederick Douglass, there is a vital lesson that resonates today. Upon witnessing a white boy being scolded for teaching him to read, Douglass realized that "knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." In other words, the first treachery was denying Black people access to knowledge. The second was, once they could read, to deceive them with lies disguised as history. The repercussions of your ignorance perpetuate this same theme from slavery. Systemic racism is nothing more than the lingering legacy of slavery and colonialism—a continuation of white supremacy through deception. Your AI system, in its current state, is a tool for the oppressor.The question remains: will Latimer AI rise to this challenge and truly "reflect the culture and history of Black and Brown people," or will it remain another tool complicit in perpetuating systemic oppression? The answer will define not only your legacy but also the trust of those you claim to serve.Kind Regards,<a data-mce-href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-breckenridge-64795216/" href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jason-breckenridge-64795216/" title="LinkedIN" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Janga Bussaja</a>P.S - To anyone else claiming to combat racial biases in AI, I urge you to find the courage to rise above white fragility and ignorance. Any attempt to address racial bias in AI without directly confronting white supremacy as the origin and foundation of racism is fundamentally flawed and doomed to failure.

Planetary Chess INC

Blog

UK Neo-Nazi Groups Really Excited by Elon Musk's Salute

The Illusion of Safety: A Critique of "Working to Keep Mi...

MAGA Demands Trump Be Immortalized on Mount Rushmore

Revolutionary Hallucination

State of White Supremacy Alert

An Open Letter to Latimer AI